|All Roads Lead to String Theory (Polchinski)|
Prior to the First Superstring Revolution
|Early History|| S-Matrix Theory|
|Bosonic String Theory|| Worldsheet|
Bosonic String Theory
String Perturbation Theory
|Supersymmetric Revolution|| Supersymmetry|
|First Superstring Revolution|| GSO Projection|
Type II String Theory
Type IIB String Theory
Type IIA String Theory
Type I String Theory
Type H String Theory
Type HO String Theory
Type HE String Theory
|Second Superstring Revolution|| T-Duality|
Horava-Witten String Theory
N=4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory
BFSS Matrix Theory
Matrix String Theory
Twistor String Theory
String Field Theory
Pure Spinor Formalism
After the Revolutions
|Phenomenology|| String Theory Landscape|
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
This article or section 's content is very similar or exactly the same as that at Wikipedia. This is because the contributor of this article had initially contributed it to wikipedia.
The Type HO String Theory also known as the Spin(32)/Z_2 Heterotic String Theory, or the SO(32) Heterotic String Theory, or the , is a 10-dimensional Heterotic String Theory. This means that the State is formed by tensoring the bosonic state (but with added Majarona-Weyl Fermions), with the Type II state. However, this raises the issue that the left-moving state is in 26 dimensional spacetime, but the right-moving state is in 10-dimensional spacetime. To fix these mismatched dimensions, we compactify the 16 mismatched dimensions on an even unimodular lattice, which means that the lattice has to have a Cartan Determinant of 1, and the vectors must have even magnitudes. For the Type HO String Theory, it is .
Action PrincipleEdit this section
Compactification of mismatched dimensionsEdit this section
With this new action for the Type H String Theory being different from the ordinary RNS Action, we have solved the issue of the imbalance between bosons and fermions. Now, we need to tackle the problem of the left-movers existing in 26 dimensions and the right-movers existing in 10 dimensions, which seems like a serious inconsiswtencsy in the theory.. To do that, we will compactify the mismatched dimensions between the left-movers and the right-movers, on a lattice, on some lattice.. Naturally, to preserve the symmetries of the Heterotic string action above, we need to make this lattice be Unimodular, or Self-Dual.
Compactification on this lattice with "dimensionless momenta" and would lead to the following condition:
But since only the left-movers are Bosonic Strings and need to be compactified ,.
I.e. the norm-squared is even. A lattice made of such vectors is an even lattice, and thus, the lattice also needs to be somewhat even.
The only suitable even, unimodular, 16 dimensional lattices are and . The String Theory is the latter.
Note that is also the gauge group of this String Theory.
Unsuitability as a Theory of EverythingEdit this section
The necessity for Heterotic Strings arose when it was found that Type IIB string theory was not suitable for the Theory of Everything and neither was Type IIA. The Type HO String Theory, however, is not suitable for the Theory of Everything either, because its gauge group cannot contain the Standard Model Gauge group as a Subgroup. However, the gauge group of Type HE is suitable for a Theory of Everything as can easily include the Standard Model Gauge group as a subgroup. ...
T-Duality with Type HE String TheoryEdit this section
Until the Second Superstring Revolution, it was thought that the two Heterotic String Theories were only connected due to their mismatched forms (i.e. with the 16 mismatched dimensions uncompactified.). However, this is useless, as this is neither a duality nor an equivalence, so one may not derive one String Theory from the other this way. During the Second Superstring Revolution, it was discovered that these two are actually related by T-Duality.
The root lattice of is , whereas the root lattice of is . Since:
ReferencesEdit this section
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 McMohan, David (2008). String theory demistified. Chicago: McGraw Hill. p. 207. ISBN 978-0071498708. http://www.nucleares.unam.mx/~alberto/apuntes/mcmahon.pdf.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Polchinski, Joseph. (1998). String Theory: Volume 2, p. = 45.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Mohaupt, Thomas. Introduction to String theory. http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0207249v1.pdf.