String Theory  

All Roads Lead to String Theory (Polchinski)  
Prior to the First Superstring Revolution
 
Early History  SMatrix Theory Regge Trajectory  
Bosonic String Theory  Worldsheet String Bosonic String Theory String Perturbation Theory Tachyon Condensation  
Supersymmetric Revolution  Supersymmetry RNS Formalism GS Formalism BPS  
Superstring Revolutions
 
First Superstring Revolution  GSO Projection Type II String Theory Type IIB String Theory Type IIA String Theory Type I String Theory Type H String Theory Type HO String Theory Type HE String Theory  
Second Superstring Revolution  TDuality DBrane SDuality HoravaWitten String Theory MTheory Holographic Principle N=4 SuperYangMills Theory AdS CFT BFSS Matrix Theory Matrix String Theory (2,0) Theory Twistor String Theory FTheory String Field Theory Pure Spinor Formalism  
After the Revolutions
 
Phenomenology  String Theory Landscape Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model String Phenomenology  
GS String Theory, or the GS Superstring Theory was an early attempt to include fermions in String Theory. "GS" stands for GreenSchwarz. In contrast to the RNS String Theory, the GS String Theory automatically has spacetime supersymmetry, but not worldsheet supersymmetry.
Introduction to Spacetime SupersymmetryEdit this section
Instead of the “fake” fermionic fields in the RNS String Theory, which are really spacetime vectors, the GS String Theory has “actual” bosonic and fermionic fields .
The Spacetime Supersymmetric transformations are given by:
This is actually intuitively related to the worldsheet supersymmetry of the RNS String Theory. Thsee are also also the transformations of superspace. It is to be noted that here, is the Dirac Gamma Matrix on the background spacetime. It is relatively trivial to show that:
This means that the commutator bracket of infinitesimal Supersymmetric transformations, translates the bosonic field by , and leaves the fermionic field untouched. These transformations, combined with the stanadard Poincaire transformations, give rise to the SuperPoincaire transformations, forming the SuperPoincaire Group.
Clearly, to be consistent with the transformations of superspace, the standard D0 brane action would have to be changed in such a way that is replaced with the field:
The subscript of 0 on the LeftHandSide indicates that only timederivatives are taken. This will be especially clear when we discuss spacetime Supersymmetry for strings and other Dbranes. The D0brane action then becomes:
This is invariant under superpoincaire transformations (and diffeomorphisms, of course). These D0branes are the same D0branes that appear in the Type IIA String Theory. The supersymmetry of the Type IIA String Theory is interpreted as having 2 spinor fermionic coordinates . Since Type IIA String Theory is a chiral theory, these have opposite chirality. In other words, due to the GSO Projection, we have:
Kappa Symmetry and D0 BranesEdit this section
The total (KappaSymmetric) action is:
Kappa Symmetry for D0 Branes
Proof of Kappa Symmetry for D0 branes 

Taking the canonically conjugate momentum to , ' The equation of motion for implies that:
From squaring the equation for the canonically conjugate momentum, we can say that:
Meanwhile, the equation of motion for is:
So, in the massive case, the fermionic field is unchanging throughout time. Else, a saturation of the BPS, implying enhanced supersymemtry. Suppose this is shown by a change to the equation of motion for , as:
This would only constrain half the components of /, which can be seen from squaring it/. The missing contribution would then be, :
The sign of this action is arbitrary. If we take it to be negative, as we have done here, then the sign of the corresponding action for the antimatter would be positive. The total action would then be:
This action actually has Kappa Symmetry. To show this, The variation , and are related by the transformations:
If you work out the transformations for , you see that w
So, under these transformations, what happens to $S_1$? . If you work it out (quite trivially), you'll see that it is equal to the following expression:
Ok, so now, !
We also obwvservwe that , so that this can be used to derive the familiar projection23:
So, adding up these actions results in a

Spacetime Supersymmetry for StringsEdit this section
The NambuGoto Action is given by:
In analogy with the action for the Supersymmetric D0 brane, the action for the Supersymmetric string would become:
Where we define:
In a way analogous to the Pi mu nought for the D0  branes.
Kappa Symmetry and D1 branesEdit this section
The total action (with supersymmetry) is therefore:
Kappa Symmetry for D1 Branes
(Please click here to view the following properly)
Proof of Kappa Symmetry for D1 branes 

The Kappa Symmetric transformations would be:
So that:
It is also clear that:
If we let
Now, to determine , we see that:
Switching to the exterior derivative ("d") notation,
here is a 2form, independent of the worldsheet metric. Introducing a threeform , we obtain the desired equation through Stokes' Theorem\\. is the boundary of / . In 10 dimensions, a Majorana spinor satisfies:
Where is a real number with an absolute value of 1. In order to ensure that is closed, i.e., that , which can be trivjially seen from explicitly writing the superspace embedding function in terms of and .
itself would be given by:
Here,
We finally conclude that this modified action is invariant under the following kappa symmetric transformations:

Relation with RNS String TheoryEdit this section
GS String Theory is equivalent to a GSO Projected RNS String Theory. The specific consistent String Theory that this is equivalent to depends on the chirality and number of components of the fermionic fields.